Standing Witness: Devils Tower National Monument, A History
by Jeanne Rogers
Published by the National Park Service as part of the Centennial celebration, Standing Witness: Devils Tower National Monument, A History is based on superintendents’ notes, monument archives, historical publications, and personal interviews. Researched and written as a commemorative history of America’s first national monument, the 290-page trade paperback includes photographs, an extensive bibliography, and a complete index.
Rogers, a freelance writer from Sundance, Wyoming, was recently invited to contribute to a forthcoming collection of poems to honor Ted Kooser, a former U.S. Poet Laureate. Her work is also included in three collections of women’s writing, several literary chapbooks juried by national award-winning writers, and many regional publications.
For more information about the event, please contact Linda Tokarczyk, Devils Tower Natural History Association, at 307-467-5283 Ext. 631 or Jeanne Rogers at 307-283-2125
Research Moments
David E. Wagner
Unforgettable moments in doing historical research make all of the mundane work involved worthwhile. Those incidents can be discovery of a long-sought piece of history, or it can be a complete surprise—a small result that comes “out of the blue.”
While researching my soon-to-be-published manuscript, Powder River Odyssey, I worked very closely with a handwritten diary by Lyman G. Bennett, the chief engineer of the Eastern Division of the Powder River Expedition of 1865. The expedition traveled a 1,300 mile path from Omaha, Nebraska, to Powder River in eastern Montana, and then to Fort Laramie in southeastern Wyoming. I drove most of that route between 2004 and 2005 accompanied by Bennett’s diary and a Bassett Hound named Trudy. Several incidents stand out.
My normal routine in tracking the route was to determine the approximate starting point of a day’s travel, then read Bennett’s entry for that day. With GPS in hand, I drove the approximate distance—Bennett was religious about entering mileage—and looked for any landmarks he described. While traveling along the North Loup River in central Nebraska, I finished a day’s route. Something didn’t seem right. I stopped for breakfast at a local cafe, spread out Bennett’s journal and a topographical map, and reviewed his entry. He had written that their path had been blocked by “a mountain that rose up before us.” They had to find a detour for their wagon train around this “mountain.” Now, I‘m from Wyoming, and I know what mountains should look like, and I had seen nothing remotely resembling a mountain on my morning drive. However my map showed a Happy Jack Peak right where Bennett said there was a mountain. After breakfast I retraced my steps about five miles, and sure enough, there stood a hill that I had driven over earlier. The highway cut into the side of the hill, and without the road, the wagon train would have had to go around it. While not much of a mountain by western standards, it probably looked pretty big to Bennett, a flatlander from Illinois.
On September 12, 1865, the expedition traveled south following Powder River in southeastern Montana. Bennett wrote, “The scenery was truly romantic. The mountains being high and worn into many fantastic shapes, such as ruins, castles, etc.” I drove slowly along a dirt road following their path. I glanced to my left and saw a butte on the east side of Powder River that looked like a medieval castle perched on a mountaintop. Bennett had described Terrett Butte, a prominent landmark in the area, about sixteen miles south of today’s Broadus, Montana. I made a U-turn, and got my camera out. It was a spine-tingling moment.
In December of 2004 I visited the Missouri Historical Society’s research library. While going through a manuscript file of Lieutenant William Thompson Shaver of the Twelfth Missouri Cavalry, I glanced at the signature on the military document in my hand. The letter was signed by John C. Fremont, the famous pathfinder. I may have gasped, although Fremont or the letter had nothing to do with my research. What a thrill to come that close to the great man.
These are just a few of the magic moments when, as a researcher, I felt closely bonded with my subject. There have been many more, and you never know when to expect them. That’s the fun of it all.
Following is the Bearlodge Writers philosophy, answering the question "What makes a good writers' group?"
If we had to answer in one word, we would say, respect, and that includes trust.
Respect for the writer. The writer comes as a pilgrim, bearing an offering. Whether the writer be prince (experience/published) or pauper (brand new beginner), he is granted the respect of willing attention and receipt of the critique he desires, whether it be “Does this work? Are the characters believable?” or a complete pre-pub edit. This includes respect for the writer’s emotions—a willingness to laugh or cry along with him.
Respect for the piece. To place the offering on the table/altar requires an act of faith by the writer. This is met by the respect of serious consideration and gentle but honest critique, focusing on the merits of the piece itself, the type of critique desired, and the intent of the writer. It is never the group’s purpose to change the intent, but to clarify, to suggest, and to encourage.
Respect for the group. Each writer brings to the group his respect for its function and for the other members, making sure each one has time for his work to be discussed, is willing to give his thoughtful critique or expertise, and holds sacred within the group whatever revelations might be shared. Because of the mutual trust within the group, there is no “competition.” Everyone has the same goal—to make each other’s work the best it can be.
And of course, pass the chocolate.